IGF-1Lr3 97% purity----SICK GAINS!!! my experiences..

[uwanafight2]

hello my friends,

just thought since my old post is no longer here i would repost...i have alot of experience with aas but until recently had only done one cycle (30days) of IGF-1 media grade..since i have found a great connect for receptor grade 97% purity IGF-1Lr3 and it has made a huge difference in my body...

i use 40mcg's 2x ed along with insulin 10ius ed..i inject into the muscle i worked the previous day for optimal site growth(hello bicepts!). Pumps are amazing, I look much fuller when i wake up every morning, all my muscles are generally bigger and more vascular, and the scale keeps goin up while bf% which is already 6-7% isnt changing..
i can most definitely say that if you havent tried IGF-1 yet, it could be whats keeping your gains to a minimum...i personally would love to run GH along with it or basically year round but the insane cost of GH makes it not worth it for me, but for muscle growth IGF-1Lr3 is a great alternative in my opinion to GH and at a fraction of the cost!
for first time users 40mcgs in 1shot ed is enough, or even 20mcgs 2x ed, i have used it a few times and have since moved up to 80mcgs ed split into 2 shots..
goodluck bros, its worth a try no question about it, and you probably will see better, more permenant gains from igf1 than if you spent the equivilant on oils, so try running alittle less and throwing in igf1 if cost is a major determining factor..
cya
UWANAFIGHT2

[bearcat]

isn't 97% pure by definition media grade? i thought receptor grade meant 99+%?

[rmtt]

Hey Bearcat,

How did your IGF cycle turn out?

[bearcat]

At first I was pretty excited by it. About 3 weeks into it I could definitely see a difference. No size/weight gains but I looked considerably harder and veinier. Then again, I wasn't eating for bulk, either. In the end I think I'd do one of two things next time instead. 1. Save some money and go with more traditional gear or 2. Spend more money and try 6mo of HGH

[uwanafight2]

isn't 97% pure by definition media grade? i thought receptor grade meant 99+%?

.. by definition 97% is receptor grade and yes it can go all the way up to 99.5% But i havent seen it sold like that anywhere...media grade is 88-90% purity..which makes a huge difference, 100mcgs of media is like 50mcgs of receptor grade igf1. so if you can get receptor at a good price its like getting media for like $100 bucks a kit..which would be damn good.

anyway, right now my 2 good gym buddies are now on my igf1lr3 and also seeings nice results but we'll have to see what the total transformation looks like in terms of muscle mass gained ect.
thanks
cya
UWANAFIGHT2

[racinghart]

now igf is insulin-like growth factor? is that equal to this thing i heard about called immense growth factor?

[Mighty Max]

did you use slin with your IGF?

MM

[Grunt76]

I don't think there actually is such as thing as real receptor-grade LR3 on the market. Be careful guys, not of uwanafight2 but of suppliers of so-called "receptor-grade" IGF-1, because there were batches of IGF-1 receptor binder peptide sold as "receptor-grade IGF-1" that even contained BSN, that is bovine serum nucleotides, which can be highly detrimental to human cells.

If you can somehow know for sure that your source has the real stuff, then great, otherwise media-grade is more than good enough, because even though the RATING for media-grade is 80% or 85% whichever, it usually TESTS at about 95%... Which in my book is plenty good.

[Cman34677]

.. by definition 97% is receptor grade and yes it can go all the way up to 99.5% But i havent seen it sold like that anywhere...media grade is 88-90% purity..which makes a huge difference, 100mcgs of media is like 50mcgs of receptor grade igf1. so if you can get receptor at a good price its like getting media for like $100 bucks a kit..which would be damn good.

anyway, right now my 2 good gym buddies are now on my igf1lr3 and also seeings nice results but we'll have to see what the total transformation looks like in terms of muscle mass gained ect.
thanks
cya
UWANAFIGHT2

I am almost certain I know EXACTLY who are are talking about since there's only a handful of well known guys touting an exact 97% purity IGF...
so I'm just going to warn you not to post too much about it because your inbox will be BOMBED with people asking for it :)... though I'm sure that you have gotten atleast a couple already lol

Cman

[uwanafight2]

THANKS CMAN, yeah hes quality and well trusted...97% is the best i have seen and i have had much better results with this IGF than i did using Genesci kits.
thanks
cya
UWANAFIGHT2..

[uwanafight2]

did you use slin with your IGF?

MM

yes i did, im usually running slin and wouldnt run igf1 without it.
youve got mail btw my friend,
cya
UWANAFIGHT2

[damien2003gt]

.. by definition 97% is receptor grade and yes it can go all the way up to 99.5% But i havent seen it sold like that anywhere...media grade is 88-90% purity..which makes a huge difference, 100mcgs of media is like 50mcgs of receptor grade igf1. so if you can get receptor at a good price its like getting media for like $100 bucks a kit..which would be damn good.



you need some basic math skills...lol

[uwanafight2]

you need some basic math skills...lol

calcIII basic enough for ya? what excactly seems to be the math mistake?:smashtard:
you are talking to the #1 guru so watch your mouth
thanks
cya
UWANAFIGHT2

[Gavin Kane]

calcIII basic enough for ya? what excactly seems to be the math mistake?:smashtard:
you are talking to the #1 guru so watch your mouth
thanks
cya
UWANAFIGHT2
#1 guru? Keep it up bro....:ban:

There is no need to talk to other members that way. Don't push your luck here, I am watching all of your posts.

[damien2003gt]

calcIII basic enough for ya? what excactly seems to be the math mistake?:smashtard:
you are talking to the #1 guru so watch your mouth
thanks
cya
UWANAFIGHT2


lol... Self Proclaiming yourself a guru is just arrogant! And the fact that you can't complete simple cross multiplication to compare the relative strengths of media and receptor grade is scary at best. It could be dangerous for a "guru" like yourself to complete any calculations regarding a cycle of anything for anybody!

[uwanafight2]

AP im trying to make light of a bad situation and was completely kidding, now you are watching all my posts..its starting to feel more like communist china then a STERIOD message board. and i get a warning but his wise ass comment is fine..umm? getting scary.

second..media is roughly 1/2 the strength of receptor, so 100mcgs of media is like taking 50mcgs of receptor..whats the problem?
cya
UWANAFIGHT2

[biggreene]

what the math comment was based on is that you say media is 88-90% purity and receptor is 97% purity.

Then you say media is 50% as strong as receptor.

97/88 equals 1.10. So, based on the purity percentages, for every 1 mcg of receptor, you need 1.1mcg of media.

That's what the math would tell you. I have done both media and receptor and I find receptor to be considerably more effective. (more than 10% more effective for sure).

[uwanafight2]

what the math comment was based on is that you say media is 88-90% purity and receptor is 97% purity.

Then you say media is 50% as strong as receptor.

97/88 equals 1.10. So, based on the purity percentages, for every 1 mcg of receptor, you need 1.1mcg of media.

That's what the math would tell you. I have done both media and receptor and I find receptor to be considerably more effective. (more than 10% more effective for sure).

BRO that is not how it works..see you jump down my throat and you dont know what you are talking about.. its not like X is 10% less pure so its 10% less effective..purity is extremely important and there is not a direct correlation!
thanks
cya
UWANAFIGHT2

[SpankyDXM]

Look yall are being retarded with this pissing match....does everyone have to be anal about everything...Even though what Uwannafight2 said about the purity is a little off , Anyone with common sense would get the picture.I am here to learn how to tweak my body to be the best it can be and yall are here complaining about #'s....Did someone take your candy away or what...Please continue with realistic data instead of pansy ass comments

[Ron Burgundy]

calcIII basic enough for ya? what excactly seems to be the math mistake?:smashtard:
you are talking to the #1 guru so watch your mouth
thanks
cya
UWANAFIGHT2
I don't even care anymore, but since you are sooo smart maybe you should realize sarcasm is hard to detect in writing. Try adding a lol or j/k to make it obvious otherwise you come off like a full blown douchebag. Maybe you are and maybe you are not.

[TheFollistatin]

My next 16 week cycle will be:

1-6 Test Prop / Tren ace shot ED 50mg/50mg
3-9 IGF-1 (97% purity) 20mcg shot 2x per day for 40mcg

5-16 Test Enth 600mg
1-16 Equipoise 600mg

PCT: IGF-1 - 4 weeks.

The first 9 weeks should be sick!

[uwanafight2]

what the math comment was based on is that you say media is 88-90% purity and receptor is 97% purity.

Then you say media is 50% as strong as receptor.

97/88 equals 1.10. So, based on the purity percentages, for every 1 mcg of receptor, you need 1.1mcg of media.

That's what the math would tell you. I have done both media and receptor and I find receptor to be considerably more effective. (more than 10% more effective for sure).

The reason it seemed "to be considerably more effective, more than 10% more effective for sure" is because its TWICE as effective! which is why i said it was 50% more effective, which you proceeded to make fun of me about because by your "calculations" it should only be 10% more effective..

again, in this case, a 10% increase in purity leads to roughly a 50% increase in response.
thanks, just wanted to make that clearer.
cya
UWANAFIGHT2

[uwanafight2]

My next 16 week cycle will be:

1-6 Test Prop / Tren ace shot ED 50mg/50mg
3-9 IGF-1 (97% purity) 20mcg shot 2x per day for 40mcg

5-16 Test Enth 600mg
1-16 Equipoise 600mg

PCT: IGF-1 - 4 weeks.

The first 9 weeks should be sick!

GREAT cycle bro, nicely thought out, a few of my friends*are using 40mcgs 2x a day and having sick results, in just two weeks my bro is looking considerably better!
cant wait to do it again,
cya
UWANAFIGHT2..btw, some will go up to 120mcgs ed.

[SMASHING MACHINE]

listen im not gonna lie... i wanna know where you are getting the receptor. PM me for the love of god.

[rottin]

listen im not gonna lie... i wanna know where you are getting the receptor. PM me for the love of god.
me too !!!!
rottin

[biggreene]

The reason it seemed "to be considerably more effective, more than 10% more effective for sure" is because its TWICE as effective! which is why i said it was 50% more effective, which you proceeded to make fun of me about because by your "calculations" it should only be 10% more effective..

again, in this case, a 10% increase in purity leads to roughly a 50% increase in response.
thanks, just wanted to make that clearer.
cya
UWANAFIGHT2

I haven't visited this thread in a while, but I wasn't making fun of you, I was explaining why the guy thought you needed basic math skills. I was attempting to explain HIS logic. Mathematically, it doesn't make sense. But this is about more than math. If you read my post, I even said I don't believe that logic, because I have done both.

You can't explain HOW it is twice as effective (or at least you haven't). All I have to go on is my experience and the experience of others, which tells me that 2x is about right. You have not explained anything, all knowing guru. Don't pop off about being so goddamned smart if you are just gonna throw the same anecdotal evidence that we already have heard from guys that have been experimenting since the day mommy dropped you off at college and paid your first tuition check.

I wasn't even arguing with you, or making fun of you. Don't be such a fucking cunt about everything.

[vortex06]

listen im not gonna lie... i wanna know where you are getting the receptor. PM me for the love of god.

Yes me too:eyebrows:

[mormussle]

Yes me too:eyebrows:

list me to.

[KARMA8]

As me 2 please.